本文针对学界及现有现代汉语及语言学教材中关于儿化词后缀“儿”的附加语素属性以及儿化词的结构方式(派生式)提出质疑。认为“儿”不是独立的语素,也不是词根加词缀的附加式合成词。应看作因儿化音变结果的语音构词,属于内部曲折构词形式(儿化音变构词),因而儿化词实质是音变结果的单纯词而非合成词。 This article questions the additional morpheme attributes of children’s terminology “child ” in the academic community and the existing textbooks of modern Chinese and linguistics, as well as the structure of children’s words (derived). That “child ” is not an independent morpheme, nor is it an additional compound word rooted affix. Should be regarded as the result of phonetic change because of the phonetic structure of words, belonging to the internal form of zigzag inflection (melodious phonological variant), so the essence of phonetic notation is the result of the simple words instead of synthetic words.