论文部分内容阅读
从断代、鉴定再到评估,古玩相比当代艺术品收藏来说,技术层面的风险自然是呈几何数倍增的,每多一条参考因素,那么误判的可能性就越高。在日常的研究和鉴定工作中,笔者经常遇到一些“不真”但也“不假”的情形,并不像很多人想象的“非黑即白”。其中最关键的因素取决于如何界定“真”这个概念。仿品、赝品、臆造品与改制品——价值判断需谨慎通常我们所说的“真”是指器物的材质、造型、纹
From the dating, appraisal to evaluation, antiques compared to contemporary art collection, the technical level of the natural risk is a geometric multiplication of multiple, each additional reference factor, then the higher the possibility of miscarriage of justice. In the daily research and appraisal work, I often encounter some “not true” but also “not false” situation, unlike many people think “black and white ”. One of the most crucial factors depends on how the definition of “true” concept. Imitation, Counterfeit, Constipation, and Reproduction - Value judgments need to be cautious. What we usually call “true” refers to the material, shape, pattern