论文部分内容阅读
揭出病苦,是为了引起疗救的注意。医院后勤社会化改革到底怎么了?得了什么病?病因何在?如何诊治?时至今日,“医院后勤社会化改革”已经走过了4个年头.与2000年政策刚出台时的热闹与亢奋相比,今天的“医院后勤社会化改革”则显得有些冷清和落寞。 曾几何时,全国上下,各种性质和类型的大小医院环围在“推进后勤改革”大旗之下.云集影从,蔚为壮观;各种改革方案、建议和意见也层出不穷,各骋其智。 但4年实践中所遭遇的挫折和困难却将“医院后勤社会化改革”打入了“叫好不叫座”的尴尬境地。不切实际的躁动逐步消退,直面现实的理性开始回归。 当然,除未达理想预期的大多数改革实践外,成功者还是有的,虽然凤毛麟角,但毕竟是值得我们思考和借鉴的范例。然而,我们更应该思考的却不是成功者缘何成功,而是失败者缘何失败。
Uncovering suffering is to draw attention to healing. What happened to the socialization reform of hospital logistics? What was the cause of the disease? What was the cause of the disease? How to treat? Nowadays, the “socialization reform of hospital logistics” has gone through four years. The buzz when the policy was first introduced in 2000 is Compared with excitement, today’s “socialization reforms in hospital logistics” appear somewhat deserted and desolate. Once upon a time, all over the country, hospitals of various natures and types circled under the banner of “promoting logistics reform.” They were gathered together and were spectacular; various reform programs, suggestions and opinions have emerged one after another. wisdom. However, the setbacks and difficulties encountered in the four years of practice have brought the “socialization reform of hospital logistics” into the embarrassing position of “being applause”. Unrealistic incitement gradually subsided, and the rationality of facing reality began to return. Of course, except for most of the reforms that fail to achieve the desired results, there are still winners. Although they are rare, they are worthy of consideration and examples. However, what we should think more about is not how a successful person succeeds, but why the loser fails.