论文部分内容阅读
2001年11月5日,东安县人民法院对一起村会计状告村支书返还财产案作出一审宣判:驳回原告唐朝洲的诉讼请求,并由其负担诉讼费400元。 唐朝洲系该县石期市镇大荣底村村民。1993年1月12日,时任村会计的唐朝洲与村支书刘绍安,一同到石期市镇经管站结算上缴费用。结算后,经管站应返回大荣底村1992年度承包费14591.49元。当时,唐朝洲出具了收款凭证,并记明了“负责人刘绍安,会计唐朝洲,收款人唐朝洲”等字样。由于经管站代扣了报刊费等各种款项,大荣底村委会实领现金8720元。为说明
On November 5, 2001, Dong’an County People’s Court made a verdict on the return of property of a village party secretary to a village accountant: dismissing the claim of the plaintiff, Tang Chauzhou, and charging a court fee of 400 yuan. Tang Chau Shihliu County, the town of Dayei Village villagers. January 12, 1993, when the village accountant Tang Chau and village party secretary Liu Shaoan, together with the Shiyan town management station payment settlement fees. After settlement, the management station should return to 1992 Wing-ding Village contract fee of 14591.49 yuan. At that time, Tang Chau issued a receipt, and recorded the words “responsible person Liu Shaoan, accounting Tang Chau, payee Tang Chau” and so on. As a result of the management station withholding the newspaper fee and other funds, the real estate fund Daiei bottom 8720 yuan. For illustration