论文部分内容阅读
在2007年1月召开的全国知识产权审判座谈会上,最高人民法院副院长曹建明指出,要“把司法保护贯穿于知识产权创造、管理和运用的全过程,为建设创新型国家和构建社会主义和谐社会提供强有力的司法保障。”知识产权诉讼的价值取向不仅来源于国家法律和政策,也来源于国家宏观思路的重大变化。建设创新型国家和构建和谐社会是国家发展的两个战略决策,也应是法官予以选择的价值目标。法官的审判活动作为一种现实权力,既可以选取、创造价值,也可以抛弃、毁灭价值。这是以法官对待诉讼的活动方式以及在诉讼中所采取的态度为必要条件的,里面包含着法官的主观能动性因素。知识产权法
At the national symposium on intellectual property rights held in January 2007, Cao Jianming, the vice president of the Supreme People’s Court, pointed out that “judicial protection should be carried out throughout the entire process of creation, management and application of intellectual property rights. In order to build an innovative nation and Building a socialist harmonious society to provide a strong judicial guarantee. ”The value orientation of intellectual property litigation not only from the national laws and policies, but also from the macroeconomic thinking of major changes. Building an innovative nation and building a harmonious society are two strategic strategies for the development of the country. They should also be the value targets that judges should choose. As a kind of realistic power, judges’ judiciary activities can not only choose and create value, but also abandon and destroy value. This is based on the way in which the judge treats the litigation as well as the attitude taken during the litigation, which contains the subjective initiative of the judge. Intellectual Property Law