去年上海地区的高考试卷总体上看是不错的。即使最后一道拉开差距的题目也很新颖,很能检查出考生的阅读理解的能力、思维分析的能力和用课本知识去解决实际问题的能力。但是,有两个题目却失误了。造成了仔细分析者既费时又容易失分,草率回答者能得分,甚至错误概念也能得分。在这两个题目上就无法区分良莠。 Last year’s high exam scores in Shanghai were good. Even the last issue that opened up the gap is quite novel, and it is possible to check the examinee’s ability to read comprehension, the ability to think and analyze, and the ability to use textbook knowledge to solve practical problems. However, there are two problems but mistakes. It is time-consuming and easy to lose points for the careful analyst. The sloppy responder can score, and even the wrong concept can score. There is no way to distinguish between good and bad on these two topics.