论文部分内容阅读
对张三丰传奇身世考证的诸多实物中,要论影响深远的,当推落款为“起敬”所作的《蓬莱仙奕图》。借助史籍的研究,研究结论为:(1)《蓬莱仙奕图》的创作时间或许就在明初洪武年间。(2)从收藏者的角度来看,该图先是由杨士奇家藏,继而落入都玄敬所说的“苏城人家”手中,再到文征明、张凤翼,稍后又到陈继儒的友人俞孺子,辗转再三,最后收入清宫的御书房。(3)从接触过该画的人物角度来看,除收藏者外,有题字的周伯琦,题诗的宋濂、胡翰、陈继儒,清代的田雯;鉴赏者有王鏊、仇英、李日华、朱谋垔、张丑和汪砢玉等。(4)就“三丰”题跋而言,按照题者的顺序,当是介于胡翰和张凤翼之间;题跋的大概时间是发生在杨士奇和文征明收藏期间,大约是正德年间;而题跋中的描述内容则多与史实相违,故疑之为讬。
To many of the real objects in the research of the legendary life of Zhang Sanfeng, we should talk about the “Penglai Sentiment Diagram” made by the impersonator as “respectfulness”. With the study of historical records, the conclusions of the study are as follows: (1) The creation time of “Penglai Xian Yi Tu” may be in the period of Hongwu in the early Ming Dynasty. (2) From the collectors’ point of view, the figure was first conceived by Yang Shiji and then fell into the hands of Du Xuanjing, “Siu Man”, to Wen Zheng-ming, Zhang Feng-yi and later to Chen Ji-ru Yu Yu son of friends, removed again and again, the final income of Imperial Imperial study. (3) From the point of contact with the artist, Zhou Boqi with inscriptions, Song Jiao, Hu Han, Chen Jiru with inscriptions, Tian Wen with Qing Dynasty, Zhu Mou 垔, Zhang Yu and Wang 砢 Yu and so on. (4) In the case of the title of “Mitutoyo”, according to the order of the subject, when it is between Hu Han and Zhang Feng-yi; the approximate time of the inscriptions occurred during the collection of Yang Shiqi and Wen Zhengming, The descriptions in the inscriptions are more contrary to the historical facts, so the suspect is 讬.