论文部分内容阅读
目的探析围绝经期妇女保健模式选择。方法 2014年12月至2015年12月期间,共有122例围绝经期妇女来我院接受健康体检,将其作为本次研究对象,以及随机法将其分为对照组及观察组,其中对照组61例,采用常规保健,观察组61例,采用全程优质保健。对两组女性保健效果进行对比。结果在保健满意度上,对照组远不及观察组(70.49%<95.08%),其差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论通过为围绝经期女性提供全程优质保健,可显著提高其保健效果,为女性提供良好的健康教育,具有极高的临床应用价值。
Objective To explore the choice of health care model for perimenopausal women. Methods A total of 122 perimenopausal women from December 2014 to December 2015 were enrolled in our hospital for physical examination. The subjects were divided into control group and observation group by random method. The control group 61 cases, using conventional health care, observation group of 61 cases, the use of full quality health care. The two groups of female health effects were compared. Results In the satisfaction degree of health care, the control group was far less than the observation group (70.49% <95.08%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion It is of great value in clinical application to provide women with good health education by providing the whole health care for perimenopausal women with high quality health care.