论文部分内容阅读
过去“史学界”在探讨“中和”概念时,一般认为“中”就是中,“和”就是和,而且对于“中”与“和”的探讨也一直都是分开论述的。其实,“中和”本来就是共生的,可以作为一个完整概念而存在,“中和”也不是一个新产生的概念。如何看待它们这种共生体的关系?换句话说,就是“中庸”与“和谐”究竟能不能合成一个概念加以表述呢?答案是可以肯定的。理由如下:一是外在的历史传统;二是内在的逻辑体与用关系;三是把握其概念的原则与方法为和本于中、求中于和。
In the past, in the study of the concept of “neutralization”, “historiography” generally holds that “” is the middle and the “and” is the sum, and that for the “middle” and the “ Discussions have always been discussed separately. In fact, ”neutralization“ is originally symbiotic and can exist as a complete concept. Neither ”neutralization“ is nor is it a new concept. In other words, how can we see the relationship between these symbionts? In other words, can ”moderate“ and ”harmony" have a concept to be formulated? The answer is affirmative. The reasons are as follows: First, the external historical tradition; second, the internal logic and the use of the relationship; third is to grasp the concept of the principles and methods for this and in, seeking in and.