通钢事件已过三个月有余,但它暴露出来的问题,说上三年似也不长。事件本身及其前后发生的类似群体性事件,其起因、过程和逻辑,无一不昭示着这样的道理:当广大职工无法在程序内发出自己的声音,那他们就要在程序外表决。只是,程序外的表决代价,太大太大了! There have been more than three months after the Tonghua incident, but the problems that it exposed are not that long ago. The causes, processes and logic of the incident itself and similar mass incidents that preceded and succeeded both manifest itself in the principle that when the majority of staff and workers can not make their own voices within the proceedings, they will have to vote outside the proceedings. However, the voting cost outside the program, too much!