论文部分内容阅读
关于十二世纪蒙古族社会的性质,是蒙古史中争论较大的一个问题。一些同志认为,十二世纪蒙古族社会处于原始社会末期,另一些同志却认为,当时的蒙古社会已经发展到奴隶占有制社会。我同意后者意见。一九六二年九月号《民族团结》发表的两篇有关这个问题的文章,进一步论述了前一种意见。根据这两篇文章的论述,据我看来,目前关于十二世纪蒙古社会性质问题争论的关键,是当时蒙古社会生产力究竟发展到了怎样的水平;当时蒙古社会的基本生产资料所有制是什么性质;蒙古社会的奴隶是什么性质;在一二○六年以前,蒙古社会中有无国家机器等问题。
About the nature of Mongolian society in the 12th century, it is a controversial issue in Mongolian history. Some comrades think that the Mongolian society in the 12th century was in the primitive society, while others thought that the Mongolian society of that time had already developed into a slave-dominated society. I agree with the latter’s opinion. Two articles on this issue, published by National Unity, September 1962, further elaborate on the former. According to these two essays, it is my opinion that the crux of the ongoing debate over the nature of the Mongolian society in the 12th century was at what level the social productive forces of Mongolia developed at that time; what was the nature of the ownership of the basic means of production in Mongolia at that time; What is the nature of slavery in Mongolian society; until 1206, there was no question of the state machine in the Mongolian society.