8月29日上海某报刊出《郭庆祥谈清代皇家宫廷艺术收藏品》(以下简称《郭文》)炮轰《石渠宝笈》的观点,引来一番热议,此后该报陆续刊发石建邦《雅俗是对的——与郭庆祥先生商榷》(以下简称《石文》)及孙逊《盲目的文化自傲——读到郭庆祥先生的大作〈庸俗的清宫皇家收藏〉有感》(以下简称《孙文》)的文章对郭氏的观点予以反驳。此后 On August 29, a Shanghai newspaper reported that “Guo Qingxiang talked about the collection of imperial court art in the Qing Dynasty” (hereinafter referred to as “Guo Wen”) and criticized the view of “Shiwan Baodi” and attracted some heated arguments. Later, the newspaper published Shi Jianbang “Elegance and vulgarity are right - to discuss with Mr. Guo Qingxiang” (hereinafter referred to as “Shi Wen”) and Sun Xun “blind cultural pride - to read Mr. Guo Qingxiang’s masterpiece” vulgar Qing imperial collection “(hereinafter referred to as” Sun Wen ") article to Kuo’s point of view to be refuted. After that