论文部分内容阅读
“两高”明确网络诽谤“情节严重”的四个标准,为打击网络诽谤提供了法律依据。但量化后的标准也带来一些争议。通过实证分析方法发现,“同一诽谤信息实际被点击、浏览次数达到五千次以上,或者被转发次数达到五百次以上的”的量化标准存在一些缺憾,并可能在具体法律适用过程中带来一些问题。为使该量化标准更有信度,建议引入“浏览次数与转发次数的比值”作为参考标准。
“Two highs ” Clear network slander “The plot is serious ” The four standards, to crack down on network defamation provided the legal basis. However, the quantitative standard also brought some controversy. Empirical analysis shows that there are some shortcomings in the quantitative standard that “the same defamation information is actually clicked, the number of times of browsing is more than 5,000 times, or the number of times of retransmission is more than 500 times, and there may be some shortcomings in the application of specific laws Bring some problems In order to make this quantitative standard more credible, it is suggested to introduce ”the ratio of the number of views to the number of retransmissions" as a reference standard.