自从核心期刊在我国产生以来,学术界一直充满着争议,见仁见智,众说纷纭。否定者认为核心期刊上发表的文章也有质量一般的,有人甚至认为核心期刊制度带来了学术腐败,因此,应尽快取消。其实,核心期刊的诞生有其客观的原因,也确实存在一定的不足。但不是全盘否定,正确的做法是逐步改进核心期刊的评选机制,使它更加科学合理。 Since the core journals have been produced in our country, the academic circle has been full of controversy, different opinions. Negators believe that the quality of the articles published in the core journals is also fair. Some people even think that the core journals system has brought about academic corruption and should therefore be canceled as soon as possible. In fact, the birth of core journals has its objective reasons, but also does exist some deficiencies. However, it is not a total denial. The correct approach is to gradually improve the selection mechanism of core journals to make them more scientific and rational.