论文部分内容阅读
近读《中国邮史研究》2004年第1期吴福全《黑龙江地方邮件附加费之最》一文(以下简称吴文),对其中某些观点实不敢苟同。吴文说:“凭证、戳记最规范。”那么,实际情况究竟如何呢?我认为其实不然。先说凭证,何谓规范?1988年8月18日,黑龙江省邮电管理局下发的(1988)邮邮字284号《关于征收邮政通信建设附加费有关事项的通知》明确指出:“‘印刷品附加费收据’样式见《处理办法附样二》,该‘收据’列为业务单式目录,代号为‘内邮1101’按业务单式进行管理,
Recently read “China Post Research” 2004 the first period Wu Fuquan “Heilongjiang local mail surcharge” (hereinafter referred to as Wu Wen), some of them do not agree with the views. Wu said: “Vouchers, stamps the most standardized.” So, what is the actual situation? I think it is not. On August 18, 1988, the Notice on Matters Concerning the Collection of Surcharges for Postal and Communications Construction issued by Post Office (1988) No. 284 issued by Heilongjiang Provincial Bureau of Posts and Telecommunications clearly states: “The printed matter attached Fee receipt ’style see ”sample with sample two", the’ receipt ’as a single business directory, code-named’ postal 1101 ’by business-style management,