论文部分内容阅读
根据我国《刑法》第二十五条规定:“二人以上共同过失犯罪,不以共同犯罪论。”由此可见我国刑法存在共同过失的提法,同样承认共同过失犯罪的,只是不以共同犯罪论处。最高人民法院出台的道路交通司法解释中第五条将共同过失犯罪明确,引起学界较多争论。我国共同过失犯罪的存在是有必要的,也是逐渐的在突破立法。但是我们应该怎么对待过失共同犯罪行为的入罪,不能将所有的“共同”过失行为都定为共同犯罪。应该明确共同过失犯罪的类型——共同过失正犯。
According to Article 25 of the Criminal Law of our country, “Two or more people jointly neglect their crimes and do not make joint crimes.” Thus we can see that there is a common negligence in our criminal law. Similarly, we recognize that the common negligence crimes only With common crime theory. Article 5 of the Interpretation of Road Traffic Law promulgated by the Supreme People’s Court clarified the crime of joint negligence and caused more controversy among the academic circles. The existence of crime of common negligence in our country is necessary and gradually breaking through legislation. However, how should we deal with the crime of negligent joint crimes, and we can not make all “common” negligence acts as a common crime. The type of crime of joint negligence should be clarified - common mistakes are made by the guilty parties.