论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨药物流产与人工流产的疗效。方法 130例进行流产的女性患者,按照流产方式的不同分为研究组(人工流产)和对照组(药物流产),各65例。对比两组患者的流产效果和不良反应情况。结果研究组流产成功率为93.85%,高于对照组的69.23%,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=55.059,P<0.05)。研究组不良反应发生率为33.85%,高于对照组的15.38%,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=5.969,P<0.05)。结论相比于药物流产,人工流产的成功率更高,疗效更好,但该流产方法的不良反应较多,患者下次月经来潮时间会较长。
Objective To explore the efficacy of medical abortion and induced abortion. Methods A total of 130 female patients undergoing abortion were divided into study group (induced abortion) and control group (medical abortion) according to the abortion method, each of 65 patients. The two groups of patients were compared abortion effects and adverse reactions. Results The success rate of abortion in study group was 93.85%, which was higher than that in control group (69.23%), the difference was statistically significant (χ ~ 2 = 55.059, P <0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was 33.85%, which was higher than that in the control group (15.38%), the difference was statistically significant (χ ~ 2 = 5.969, P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with medical abortion, the success rate of artificial abortion is higher and the curative effect is better. However, the abortion method has more adverse reactions, and the patient’s menstrual period will be longer next time.