论文部分内容阅读
给学生的平时作文评分,右的评得学生垂头丧气,有的评得学生趾高气扬。这恐怕与衡量学生作文质量的标准不无关系。现在居多是用一把死尺子来衡量所右学生的作文和学生的所有作文。作文基础差的学生作文经它一量总是差那么一大截,笃定得低分;作文基础好的学生的作文经它一量,总是大大超出别人一头,也就永远得高分。前者次次低分,自卑感越来越重,一轮到作文就厌恶、恐惧;后者回回高分,远远超出于人,有的便会产生优越意识,从而骄傲自满,不思长进。为了纠正这种弊端,我认为可来用一种弹性评分法,给学生的平时作文评分。
The scores of the students’ usual composition are scored. The students on the right judge the students downcast, and some students are praised. This is probably not related to the standard of measuring student writing quality. Nowadays most people use a dead ruler to measure the essay of the right student and all the composition of the students. The composition of the students with poor composition is always a long one, and the score is always low. The composition of a student with a good composition is measured by it. It always exceeds the number of others, and it always scores high. The first time the former scored low scores, the sense of inferiority became heavier and heavier. In the first round, the composition was disgusted and fearful. The latter returned high scores far beyond the individual, and some of them would produce superior consciousness, thus being proud and complacent and not thinking about growing. In order to correct this malpractice, I think we can use a flexible scoring method to score students’ usual writing.