书法到底有没有标准?有,也没有。所谓“有”是指定性的标准;“没有”是指定量的标准。我们无法用一种对象化的方式,去确认一件书法作品究竟可以打多少分,更何况,用自然科学的定量分析法去衡量人文艺术,这本身就是一种错位。但我们之所以可以在一个相对的范围内自由地谈论一件作品的利弊得失,则又证明一个模糊的标准还是存在的——失去标准的世界一天也维持不下去。而将标准细节化到每一个举止投足,这个世界也同样无法运转。 Is there any standard in calligraphy? The so-called “yes ” is a qualitative standard; “no ” is a quantitative standard. We can not use an objectified way to confirm how much a piece of calligraphy can actually play. What’s more, using the quantitative analysis of natural science to measure the humanities and arts is a dislocation in itself. But the reason why we can freely talk about the merits and demerits of a piece of work within a relative scope proves that a vague standard still exists. The lost standard world can not be maintained in a single day. The standard details to every manners, the world also can not work.