不断出现的祭奠纠纷案件给司法实务带来了难题,对于祭奠纠纷的法律解释问题则成为处理此类案件的关键所在。作为我国侵权法体系导航器的《侵权责任法》却对此没有明文规定,但通过对该法第2条的分析与解释,“祭奠利益”能够在“民事权益”的范围内找到根据,祭奠利益是《侵权责任法》的当然保护对象,从而解决了实践中处理祭奠纠纷案件于法无据的尴尬局面。 The continuous cases of memorial disputing bring problems to the judicial practice, and the legal interpretation of the memorial disputing issues becomes the key to handling such cases. However, the “tort liability law”, as the navigator of the tort law system, does not expressly provide for this. However, through the analysis and interpretation of Article 2 of the Law, the “sacrifice benefit” can be implemented within the scope of “civil rights and interests” Found the basis, the interests of the sacrifice is “Tort Liability Act” of course, the object of protection, thus solving the practice of handling cases of memorial dissidence in the lawlessness of the embarrassing situation.