论文部分内容阅读
在我国,由于公司法对股东身份资格取得的条件没有明确的规定,各司法机关在审判实践中对如何认定挂名股东的资格经常采纳不同的标准,导致同一案件事实在不同法院之间的不同判决,损害了司法的权威。文章通过对一例挂名股东资格认定纠纷案件的介绍,就挂名股东资格认定的两种不同标准予以了评述,指出在挂名股东资格的法律认定中应当坚持的原则,主张在处理挂名股东资格的法律认定纠纷中应当区分当事人之间的关系是属于内部关系还是外部关系而适用不同的标准,并结合案例进行了论述。
In our country, because the company law does not have the explicit stipulation to the qualifications of the shareholders, various judiciary often adopt different standards in the trial practice on how to identify the qualifications of the nominated shareholders, which leads to different judgments in the same case between different courts , Undermining the authority of the judiciary. By introducing a case of disputes over accreditation of registered shareholders, the article reviews two different criteria for accreditation of accredited shareholders, points out the principle that should be adhered to in the legal affirmation of accredited shareholders, and advocates that the legal affirmation of the legal status of accredited shareholders Disputes should be divided between the parties whether the relationship between internal or external relations and the application of different standards, combined with the case were discussed.