论文部分内容阅读
一、“专业课”与“故事会”分析美术作品,特别是绘画作品,构图、造型、色彩、笔触、肌理这些是重要途径。但如果在欣赏课中对着一群没有受过专业训练的学生,一讲构图就必谈“三角形、S形”, 一讲色彩就必分析“环境色、光源色”,甚至对着光溜溜的印刷品大谈“色层厚薄、肌理丰富”,这种“专业课”可能只有美术专业的学生才会听得津津有味。即使教师分析得头头是道,无懈可击,学生也只会听得云里雾里,索然无味。这种忽视学生实际接受水平的教法说得难听点就是
First, “specialized courses” and “story” analysis of art works, especially painting, composition, modeling, color, brushwork, texture of these is an important way. However, if you are facing a group of students who have not been professionally trained in appreciation class, you will have to talk about “triangle, S-shape” when speaking about composition. If you talk about color, you will analyze “environment color, light source color,” and even the glossy print Talking about “color layer thickness, texture rich,” this “specialized course” may only art students will hear relish. Even if the teachers have the right analysis, the students will only hear the foggy and dull. This ignoring the actual level of acceptance of the students is a sobering point