考古工作的每一步新进展,都推动了人们对古代事物的新认识。关于戟的探讨即是如此。从清儒研究考工戟制,到1930年郭沫若先生撰写《说戟》,1935年郭宝钧先生发表《戈戟余论》,曾有人认为,关于戟已经没有再讨论的必要了。但70年代以来,考古发掘又发现了许多新的有价值的材料,促使学术界对戟作进一步的研究,本文将在此基础上,对一些问题进行讨论。 Every step of new progress in archeological work has promoted people’s new understanding of ancient things. The discussion on the halberd is the case. From the study of Qing Confucianism to halberd, until the year of 1930, Mr. Guo Moruo wrote “Halberd,” and in 1935 Mr. Guo Baojun published “Gojiuyuanyu”. Some people think that halberd is no longer necessary for discussion. However, since the 1970s, archaeological excavations have found many new valuable materials, prompting academic circles to further study the halberds. Based on this, this article will discuss some issues.