论文部分内容阅读
目的：弄清爱婴病房艾条熏蒸对病毒的灭活效果。方法：爱婴病房采用艾条熏蒸进行空气消毒，通过ＥＬＩＳＡ检测熏蒸后对乙肝病毒ＨＢｓＡｇ 和ＨＢｅＡｇ 抗原性的破坏效果，并与过氧乙酸熏蒸效果进行了对比试验。结果：爱婴病房艾条熏蒸后对乙肝病毒ＨＢｓＡｇ 的抗原性有明显的破坏作用（ Ｐ＜ ０．０５） ，对ＨＢｅＡｇ 的抗原性的破坏有极显著性意义（ Ｐ＜ ０．００１），Ｓ／Ｎ 比值＞ ２．１ ；过氧乙酸熏蒸后对ＨＢｓＡｇ 和ＨＢｅＡｇ 的抗原性的破坏均具有极显著性差异（ Ｐ＜ ０．００１），Ｓ／Ｎ 比值均＜ ２．１ ；艾条熏蒸组明显低于过氧乙酸熏蒸组对ＨＢｓＡｇ 和ＨＢｅＡｇ 抗原性的破坏作用，差异有极显著意义（ Ｐ＜ ０ ．００１） 。结论：爱婴病房艾条熏蒸对乙肝病毒ＨＢｓＡｇ 和ＨＢｅＡｇ 均有一定的灭活效果，但不能达到对乙肝病毒完全灭活的目的，不可代替过氧乙酸等消毒剂对病毒的灭活作用，可用于爱婴病房的空气消毒。
Objectives: To clarify the love of AIDS fumigation of AIDS virus inactivation effect. Methods: Ai-fang ward was disinfected by air fumigation. The effect of fumigation on HBsAg and HBeAg antigenicity of fumigated hepatitis B virus was tested by ELISA. The fumigation effect of peracetic acid was compared with that of faucet. Results: The fumigation of Ai-fang ward had significant effect on the antigenicity of HBsAg (P <0.05) and the destruction of HBeAg antigenicity (P <0.001). S / N ratio> 2.1. The destruction of antigenicity of HBsAg and HBeAg after peracetic acid fumigation had extremely significant difference (P <0.001), S / N ratio <2.1; fumigation group Which was significantly lower than that of peracetic acid fumigation group on HBsAg and HBeAg antigenicity, the difference was extremely significant (P <0 .001). Conclusion: Ai-fang fumigation has certain inactivation effect on hepatitis B virus HBsAg and HBeAg, but it can not achieve the purpose of complete inactivation of hepatitis B virus and can not replace the inactivation effect of the virus by disinfectants such as peracetic acid. Air disinfection of baby-friendly wards.