论文部分内容阅读
近年来,《联合国海洋法公约》附件七成为讨论热点。在查戈斯仲裁案中,仲裁庭对第298条下涉及主权争议的混合型争端进行了比较宽泛的解释,但仲裁庭在后来的实践中又进行了限缩解释,使得海域划界问题的范围成了值得探讨的话题,从《海洋法公约》起草过程、国家实践和法庭判决来看,岛屿在海洋划界中是一种特殊的情形,并由公平原则来判断岛屿在划界中的作用,此外岛屿在划界是拥有领海和基线的。岛屿和礁岩在实践中没有明确区分,礁岩拥有有领海和毗邻区的,并能作为基点。可见,岛和礁岩的权利问题应该属于海域划界问题的一部分。
In recent years, Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea has become a hot topic of discussion. In the Chagos arbitration case, the arbitral tribunal broadly explained the mixed dispute involving the sovereignty dispute under Article 298, but the arbitral tribunal carried out a narrow-down explanation later in the course of practice to make the issue of demarcation of the sea The scope has become a topic worth discussing. From the drafting process of UNCLOS, state practice and court judgments, the island is a special case in maritime demarcation and the principle of fairness is used to judge whether the island is under demarcation In addition, the island has the territorial sea and the baseline in demarcation. There is no clear distinction between islands and reefs in practice, and the reefs have territorial waters and adjacent areas and serve as a base point. It can be seen that the issue of the rights of islands and reefs should belong to the issue of demarcation of the sea.