论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较不同方法治疗宫颈糜烂的病理结果。方法:将200例宫颈糜烂患者分为两组,其中100例应用重组人干扰素浕-2a栓(以下简称干扰素)治疗,100例应用微波治疗,观察其病理改变。结果:重度宫颈糜烂治疗效果微波组明显高于干扰素组,差异有显著性(P<0.01);轻度宫颈糜烂两种方法治疗效果、病理情况无明显差异。结论:根据具体情况选用不同的治疗方案治疗宫颈糜烂。
Objective: To compare the different methods of treatment of cervical erosion pathological results. Methods: 200 cases of cervical erosion patients were divided into two groups, 100 cases of which were treated with recombinant human interferon-2a suppositories (hereinafter referred to as interferon), 100 cases of microwave treatment, observe the pathological changes. Results: The therapeutic effect of severe cervical erosion in microwave group was significantly higher than that in interferon group, the difference was significant (P <0.01); mild cervical erosion two methods of treatment effect, pathological no significant difference. Conclusion: According to the specific conditions of different treatment options for treatment of cervical erosion.