论文部分内容阅读
【目的】通过科学的办刊措施,预防互联网时代频发的伪审稿事件。【方法】确立期刊的稿件评价标准,明确符合评价稿件的同行专家资格,在互联网投审稿平台系统各个环节中执行稿件的评价标准。【结果】期刊疏于管理将引起伪审稿事件;为了淘汰低劣稿件,期刊编辑既要博学,又要善于管理和使用网络平台系统及各种先进的防伪工具;为了公平公正的评阅稿件,编辑必须以稿件评价标准严格初审稿件,充分权衡同行评审意见的有效性和合理性。【结论】同行评审是学术期刊出版的基石。预防伪审稿必须严格执行期刊的稿件评价标准,杜绝第三方代投、代评和代写稿件。
【Objective】 Through scientific measures, prevent the pseudo-manuscript incident frequently occurred in Internet era. 【Method】 The evaluation criteria of manuscripts of journals were established, the qualifications of peer experts in line with evaluation manuscripts were clearly defined, and the evaluation criteria of manuscripts were implemented in all aspects of the internet platform for review and approval. [Results] Journal neglect management will lead to pseudo-manuscript event; In order to eliminate inferior manuscripts, journal editors must be learned, but also good at managing and using the network platform system and a variety of advanced anti-counterfeiting tools; In order to fair and impartial review of manuscripts, editing Article manuscripts must be strictly rigorous review of manuscripts, trade-offs to fully weigh the validity and rationality of peer review. 【Conclusion】 Peer review is the cornerstone of academic journals. Preventing false reviewers must strictly implement the evaluation criteria of the manuscripts of the periodicals and put an end to third-generation substitutes, acting on behalf of the judges and writing manuscripts.