论文部分内容阅读
原本《玉篇》引《诗》非常丰富,具有重要的文献学价值。本文通过例证指出,在版本方面,这些引《诗》可以考证汉至唐前的《诗经》著述体制。在校勘方面,因原本《玉篇》为目前较早引用《诗经》的文本,具有重要的校勘价值。在辑佚方面,可以作清代三家《诗》辑佚的重要补充。在提供异文方面,可以为重新考察清代辑佚三家《诗》的方法提供新的思考。同时指出,原本《玉篇》所引《诗》之经、传、笺文字与今传《毛诗》不同,除了有钞胥手误外,也存在顾野王为《玉篇》体例而故意改易传、笺文字的情况。
The original “Jade articles” cited “poetry” is very rich, with important literature value. This article points out that in the aspect of edition, these quotations of “poems” can verify the system of the Book of Songs from the Han to the Tang dynasties. In collation, due to the original “Jade articles” for the current reference to the “Book of Songs,” the text has an important value of the collation. In the collection of poems, it can be an important supplement to the three “poem” collections in the Qing Dynasty. In the aspect of providing foreign language, it can provide new thinking for revisiting the method of “Three Poems” in the Qing Dynasty. At the same time, pointed out that the original “Yu Pian” quoted “poem” by the scriptures, spread, 笺 text with today’s biography “Maoshi poem” is different, in addition to banknote hand Xu error, but also there GuYuZhi as “jade articles” and deliberately Change easy to pass, 笺 text situation.