对新流行词“话语权”的若干思考

来源 :术语标准化与信息技术 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:wcd_soft
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
“话语权”一词近几年来在中文媒体上出现后被广泛沿用的过程中,在文辞表达上普遍存在着概念模糊、文理不通和逻辑混乱的现象。对此,作者通过分析指出其根本原因,在于该词并不具有可被确切把握和让人们达成共识的真实涵义。进一步从语言学和术语学的角度分别进行深入探索,其结果表明:“话语权”作为普通词语不符合组词规则;对于相关学科(如“传播学”)来说,它也不能成为可以表达某个特定概念的名实相符的专业术语。文章最后还分析指出了该词近几年间之所以能成为“新流行词”的几方面原因。 In recent years, the term “discourse right” has been widely used in the Chinese media. In the process of expressing rhetoric, the concept of ambiguity, incoherent literary and logical confusion prevails. In this regard, the author points out that the root cause of the analysis is that the word does not have the true meaning of being able to grasp exactly and let people reach an agreement. Further exploration is carried out from the perspective of linguistics and terminology, respectively. The results show that: “discourse ” as an ordinary word does not conform to the rules of group rules; for related disciplines (such as “Communication Studies ”) It can not be a naming convention that can express a particular concept. Finally, the article also analyzes the reasons why the term has become “new buzzword” in recent years.
其他文献
目的探讨急性缺血性脑卒中患者头颅磁共振DWI-FLAIR序列不匹配性的临床检测意义。方法筛选2015年5月至2015年12月收治的急性缺血性脑卒中患者32例,作为研究对象。所有患者均