论文部分内容阅读
本文试图补充对公开协商对话的经验理解以及关于如何在中国基层治理中有效运用利益公开协商实践的讨论。考察了通过公开协商对话形式探索基层议事机制的“民主恳谈”案例,从组织权力调整和操作程序设计两个方面图解公开协商实践的丰富路径,同时从协商对话质量、最终决策形式以及议程可持续性考察不同路径的实践效果。分析表明,公开协商对话形式在中国基层治理中的运用面临重大挑战,并不能简单地达成实质性效果,而应对挑战的务实之路在于协调推进组织权力调整和操作程序设计的配套改革。从而,利益公开协商在中国基层治理中具有潜在的广阔运用前景,对此本文进一步基于案例分析讨论提出了具体建议。
This paper attempts to supplement the empirical understanding of the open consultation dialogue and the discussion of how to openly negotiate the effective use of benefits in grassroots governance in China. Examines the case of “democratic truth” exploring the mechanism of grass-roots deliberations through open negotiation and dialogues, illustrates the rich path of open negotiation practice from two aspects of organizational power adjustment and operational procedure design, and at the same time, from the negotiation dialogue quality, the final decision-making form and the agenda Sustainability examines the practical effects of different paths. The analysis shows that the open negotiation form of dialogue is facing major challenges in the application of grassroots governance in China and can not simply reach substantive results. The pragmatic way to deal with the challenges lies in coordinating and promoting coordinated reforms in the design of organizational power and operational procedures. As a result, open negotiation of interests has potential and broad application prospects in grassroots governance in China. To this end, this article further puts forward specific suggestions based on the case analysis and discussion.