一、问题的提出长期以来,我国刑法理论在目的犯这个问题上热衷于讨论所谓的目的说和动机说,并为此投入了大量的学术资源。[1]有学者认为动机说与目的说在刑法具体问题的处理上没有什么不同,因此对此加以区分就很难说有现实意义。[2]也有学者认为这种讨论源自于对外国刑法学的片面理解和主观主义的影响,并主张以直接故意意志因素和意志以外的目的或断绝结果犯和短缩二行为犯替代之。[3] First, the issue raised For a long time, China’s criminal law theory in the purpose of committing this issue is keen to discuss the so-called purpose and motivation to say, and for this has invested a large amount of academic resources. [1] Some scholars think that the motivation to say and purpose in dealing with specific issues of the criminal law is no different, so to distinguish between this is hard to say that practical significance. Some scholars think that this discussion stems from the one-sided understanding and subjectivism of foreign criminal jurisprudence, and advocates that direct intentional will and intention beyond the will or alternative offended and shortened prisoners. [3]