论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比分析阴式子宫全切与腹式子宫全切的手术方法和临床效果。方法:选取我院2012年10月-2013年10月间收治的50名行阴式子宫全切的患者设为观察组,另选同期的50名行腹式子宫全切的患者设为对照组,采用回顾性的方式分析两组患者的临床资料,并对比分析两组患者的手术时间、住院时间、术后排气时间、子宫质量、术中出血量。结果:对比数据结果显示,观察组患者的患者的手术时间、住院时间、术后排气时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05),术中出血量明显少于对照组(P<0.05),子宫质量明显小于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:阴式子宫全切与腹式子宫全切是临床上的两种常用子宫切除方法,而阴式子宫切除术具有手术时间短、手术创伤小、术中出血量低等优势,值得在临床应用上推广。
Objective: To compare and analyze the operation method and clinical effect of vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. Methods: Fifty patients underwent vaginal hysterectomy in our hospital from October 2012 to October 2013 were selected as the observation group. Fifty patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy at the same period were selected as the control group The clinical data of two groups were analyzed retrospectively. The operation time, hospitalization time, postoperative exhaust time, uterine quality and intraoperative blood loss were compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with the control group, the operation time, hospital stay and postoperative exhaust time in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P <0.05). The bleeding volume in the observation group was significantly less than that in the control group (P <0.05) The uterus quality was significantly less than that of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: Vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy are the two commonly used clinical methods of hysterectomy, while vaginal hysterectomy has the advantages of short operation time, small trauma and low intraoperative blood loss, which is worth clinical treatment Application promotion.