:公文体式写作研究阐述最简易的类型是浅显知识介绍 ,通常以“怎样写 ”的模式出现。这只能算是一种启蒙教育。公文体式写作研究阐述最普遍、流行时间最长的类型要数“格式说明 +例文”的简易模式。这种模式比起浅显知识介绍型来 ,有所进步 ,但非常有限。问题主要在于运用这种模式过于简单 ,过于粗疏 ,在例文的引用列举上尤其如此。这表现在 :一个公文体式只举一篇例文 ,而且没有分析说明 ;一个公文体式举有多篇例文 ,但同样没有分析说明 ;错用例文而产生误导 ;错用病文作范文而产生误导 ;推荐病文作范文而加深误导等。公文体式写作研究逡巡不前的原因之一是人们至今仍普遍认为公文写作只是一种简易、机械的技术操作 ,所谓的公文写作学是不存在的 ;原因之二是公文写作研究人员的队伍尚不精锐有力 ,特别是缺乏能真正统领大军冲锋陷阵的将领和统帅。 (打破这种现状的 )突破口是群策群力 ,及早编创一部能极有效地指导公文写作实践的新经典《现代“尚书”》来。 : Official Writing Style Study The easiest type of study to elaborate on is the simple introduction of knowledge, usually in the form of “how to write”. This can only be regarded as a kind of enlightenment education. The study of style writing style describes the most common, the longest type of popular to the number of “format instructions + examples of” simple mode. This model has made some improvements over the simple introduction of knowledge, but it is very limited. The main problem is that the use of this model is too simple and too coarse, especially in quoted examples. This is manifested in the fact that one official style uses only one piece of text and there is no analysis and explanation. One official style uses multiple articles, but there is no analytical explanation. Misunderstanding of the use of the examples, misleading misuse of the essay as an example, Recommended essay for the text and deepen misleading. One of the reasons why the study of style writing style is not patron savvy is that it is generally accepted that document writing is merely a simple and mechanical technical operation. The so-called official document writing does not exist. The second reason is that the ranks of researchers who write official documents Not vigorous and powerful, especially the lack of generals and commanders who can really command the army’s charge. The breakthrough point (to break this status quo) is to work together to create an early “modern” book that can effectively guide the practice of official document writing.