写历史粗好还是细好?朱正先生以此为题在《南方周末》(1998年8月21日)发表文章,举《文汇报》一度变成《教师报》的历史为例,比较粗细两者的得失,认为用粗线条写历史,便于涂上一层情绪化的、倾向性的色彩;写得细一些,才有助于显示出事件的真相。我赞成这个意见,并想补充说,流行的“宜粗不宜细”论,说的 Writing history is good or fine? Zhu Zheng took this as a topic in the “Southern Weekend” (August 21, 1998) published an article entitled “Wen Wei Po” became “Teacher Newspaper” of the history, for example, the thickness of two Those who believe that the history should be written in thick lines should be easily painted with an emotional and tendentious color. Writing a little thin will help reveal the truth of the incident. I agree with this opinion and would like to add that the popular “should not be fine” theory says