20世纪20年代中期“纯诗”理论的提倡者们如穆木天、王独清都曾试图指出他们的“纯诗”主张与自“五四”以来的“国民文学”理念并无矛盾。他们的这种辩解固然具有一定理论上的合理性,也反映了他们跻身“新文学”主流、获得“合法性”的强烈愿望,但是,“纯诗”与“国民文学”在语言取向、审美取向、价值取向等诸方面都具有难以规避的深层张力与深层悖论。 In the mid-1920s, advocates such as Mu Mutian and Wang Duqing all tried to point out that their “pure poetry ” claims and since the “May 4th” “national literature The concept is not contradictory. Although their justifications are theoretically reasonable, they also reflect their strong desire to gain ”legitimacy “ in the mainstream of ”new literature “. However, ”pure poems “ and ”nationals Literature "has deep tension and deep paradox in language orientation, aesthetic orientation, value orientation and so on.