论文部分内容阅读
目的对比分析腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫肌瘤的临床疗效。方法 100例子宫肌瘤患者随机分为腹腔镜手术组(55例)和开腹手术组(45例),对比两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、术后住院天数等指标。结果腹腔镜手术组手术时间比开腹手术组长(P>0.05),但术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、术后住院天数均明显小于开腹手术组(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜手术治疗子宫肌瘤具有创伤小、出血少、康复快,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic and open surgery in the treatment of uterine fibroids. Methods 100 patients with uterine fibroids were randomly divided into laparoscopic surgery group (55 cases) and open surgery group (45 cases). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative anal exhaust time, postoperative hospital stay And other indicators. Results The operation time of laparoscopic surgery group was longer than that of laparotomy group (P> 0.05). However, the amount of blood loss, postoperative anal exhaust time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly less than those of laparotomy group (P <0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of uterine fibroids with less trauma, less bleeding, rapid recovery, it is worth promoting the clinical application.