论文部分内容阅读
侵犯虚拟财产的问题,即有理论的相持观点并未揭示问题的实质,在财物的属性、虚拟财产的类别、手段与目的的区分及虚拟与现实的证立路径上存在各说各话的嫌疑,结合具体规范的微观视角,和侵财犯罪本质的普遍性定言令式规则,虚拟财产中的绝大部分不应受财产罪的规制,其中具有满足基本生活所需的,有稳定价值关系的一部可以以侵犯财产性利益加以保护,其余的应纳入计算机相关犯罪处理,同时应注意虚拟财产自身特性所应坚守的谦抑性品质。
The problem of infringing on virtual property, that is, the theory of stalemate does not reveal the essence of the problem. There are suspicions on the property of property, the category of virtual property, the distinction between the means and the purpose, and the path of establishing the virtual and the reality , Combined with the specific norms of the micro-perspective, and the nature of the crime of aggression, the universality of the definitive formula rules, the vast majority of virtual property should not be subject to the crime of property regulation, which has to meet the basic needs of life, have a stable value relationship One can be infringed the property interests to be protected, the rest should be included in computer-related crime handling, and should pay attention to the virtual property should adhere to its own character of restrained quality.