论文部分内容阅读
目次一、微软垄断案及其对我国反垄断立法的启示二、反垄断法中市场支配地位的界定三、反垄断法中对滥用市场支配地位的确认四、反垄断法中对滥用市场支配地位的抗辩与制裁一、微软垄断案及其对我国反垄断立法的启示1999年11月5日,美国联邦地区法院法官托马斯·彭菲尔德·杰克逊就美国司法部和19个州控告微软公司实行垄断一案作出了举世瞩目的初步裁决。该裁决认定美国微软公司为垄断企业,从事了垄断行为。杰克逊法官公布的事实认定书中提出了三条理由:第一,微软在全球个人电脑操作系统的占有率已经稳定地保持在95%以上;第二,微软的市场占有率受到进入该产业高入门障碍的保护;第三,由于微软产品的高入门障碍,消费者缺乏商业上显著
First, the Microsoft monopoly case and its enlightenment on China’s antitrust legislation II, the definition of market dominance in the antitrust law III, the antitrust law to confirm the abuse of market dominance IV, the anti-monopoly law abuse of market dominance Defense and Sanctions on Microsoft’s Monopoly Case and Its Enlightenment on China’s Antitrust Legislation On November 5, 1999, US Federal District Court Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson filed a monopoly on the U.S. Department of Justice and 19 state-controlled Microsoft companies The case made a preliminary ruling of world attention. The ruling found that Microsoft, the United States, monopolized the business and engaged in monopolistic behavior. Judge Jackson’s Fact Book issued three reasons: First, Microsoft’s share of the global PC operating system has remained stable at 95% or more; second, Microsoft’s market share is hindered by its entry into the industry Third, due to the high barriers to entry of Microsoft products, consumers lacked commercially significant