论文部分内容阅读
以腐败为代表的公共权力运行失范仍然是我国一个十分突出的社会和政治问题。公共权力控制有各种具体的机制,这些机制如何定位、如何组合都会影响权力控制系统的效果。制约机制、激励机制和道德机制对权力的控制具有经常性,并且控制力量来自于权力运行系统内部,一般称为内部经常性控制;监督机制、问责机制和公开透明机制对权力的控制不具有经常性,并且控制力量来自于权力运行系统外部,一般称为外部非经常性控制。国家治理现代化,要求公共权力控制体系必须能够有效地抑制机会主义行为;要求内部经常性控制模式为主、外部非经常性控制模式为辅;要求内部经常性控制系统中,制约机制为主,激励机制和道德机制达到一定的水准;要求外部非经常性控制系统中,监督机制、问责机制和公开透明机制并重。
The dysfunctional operation of public power, represented by corruption, remains a prominent social and political issue in our country. There are various specific mechanisms for the control of public power. How these mechanisms are located and how they are combined will affect the effectiveness of the power control system. Restrictions, Incentives, and Moral Mechanisms Control of power is recurrent, and controls come from within the system of power operations, commonly referred to as internal recurrent controls; oversight mechanisms, accountability mechanisms and open and transparent mechanisms do not control power Recurring, and controlling forces come from outside the power running system, commonly referred to as external, non-recurrent controls. The modernization of state governance requires that the public power control system must be able to effectively suppress opportunistic behavior. The internal and external recurrent control modes should be supplemented. The external recurrent control mode should be supplemented. Mechanisms and moral mechanisms have reached a certain level. In external non-recurring control systems, the oversight mechanisms, accountability mechanisms and open and transparent mechanisms are required to be equal.