针对拾金不昧有奖的话题,同学们有的赞成,认为在当下弘扬雷锋精神,也需要物质刺激;有的从操作角度,质疑其如何实施;有的坚决反对,认为物质奖励会玷污美德的纯洁性,造成利益驱动。这些都持之有据、言之成理,反映了同学们很高的认识水平和思辨能力。我认为,拾到他人物品必须归还,是世间普遍认同的道德准则,这一点毋庸置疑。《物权法》对物主及拾遗者的权利和义务都作出相关界定,这是基本准则。法律法规以其权威性和强制力,倡导高尚道德行为,也守护着基本道德底 In view of the topic of “picking up gold without prize”, some students agree with it and think that to promote the spirit of Lei Feng nowadays also needs material stimulation; some question from the operating point of view how to implement it; some strongly oppose that the material reward will tarnish the purity of virtue , Resulting in profit-driven. These are well-founded, well-established, reflecting the students a high level of awareness and ability to think. I think there is no doubt about the fact that it is universally accepted as a moral guideline that the return of the belongings to others must be returned. The “Property Law” defines the rights and obligations of both the owner and the survivor, which is the basic principle. Laws and regulations, with their authority and coercion, advocate noble moral behavior and also guard the basic moral foundation