纵观近年来见诸报刊的影视评论,有一种倾向很令人担忧,就是我们的影视评论文章大有越写越深奥,越写越使人难以看懂的势头。新学科的引进,各种学术名词的堆砌,似乎非此不成“文章”,非此不说明自己的“渊博”。久而久之,纷纷效尤,结果出现了一些只有“花架子”没有引导欣赏阅读价值的文章。观众看不懂,理不清,自然不愿涉及那洋洋大观的“拳头”文章。这些文章也失去了应有的作用和影响。影视评论的故作高深和故弄玄虚,是否影响着影视剧的创作者?是否影响了影视评论的正常发展?是否有助于观众欣赏,认识理解作品? Looking at the film and television reviews of newspapers and periodicals in recent years, there is a trend that is very worrying. This is the tendency of our television review articles to write more and more profoundly and write more and more hard to understand. The introduction of new disciplines, the accumulation of a variety of academic terms, it seems that this is not an “article”, this does not explain their own “profound.” As time passes, one after another effect, resulting in some only “flower shelf” did not guide reading appreciation of the article. The audience can not understand, not clear, naturally do not want to involve the grand fist article. These articles also lose their due role and influence. Does film critique’s premeditated sophistry and trickery affect the creators of film and television drama? Does it affect the normal development of film criticism? Does it help the audience to appreciate and understand comprehension?