《大自然的文字》一文说:“建筑工地上挖出了一块灰色的石头,你只知道这不过是一块普通的石头,可在懂得大自然文字的人看来,它并不普通。它是石灰石,是由碎贝壳造成的。大家都知道贝类是海洋里的居民,可见在远古时代,现在是城市的这块地方曾经是一片汪洋。”其实不要说沿海的城市了,就是远在内陆的“世界屋脊”喜马拉雅山,那里曾经也是一片海洋。作出这样的判断有什么 The article “Nature’s Words” says: “A gray stone was dug out of the building site, and you only knew it was just an ordinary stone. It does not seem to ordinary people who understand the natural language. Is limestone, is caused by the broken shells.We all know that shellfish is a resident of the oceans, we can see in ancient times, now is a piece of land in this part of the city. ”“ In fact, not to mention the coastal city, is far away In the inland ”Roof of the World" Himalayas, where once was a sea. What makes such a judgment?