论文部分内容阅读
温权在《晋阳学刊》2014年第2期撰文指出,别尔嘉耶夫的哲学思想可被认为是对工业文明的反思,而马克思主义哲学则是通过批判资本主义制度,进而对整个工业文明进行的全面批判。他们提出的核心论断都是以对现实的关注和反思为基础的,所以,选择“现实性”这一概念,无疑就为构建马克思与别尔嘉耶夫哲学间的对话关系提供了良好的契机。马克思主义哲学是关于资本主义现实最为具体的批判。就“现实”本身的界定而言,马克思完成了经由直观、静态向实践、动态的转向,从而将世界现实转入真正属于人的视域当中,并在现实的层面上
Wen Quan In “Jin Yang Journal” 2014 the second author pointed out that Beierjaev’s philosophy can be considered as a reflection of industrial civilization, and Marxist philosophy is through the critique of the capitalist system, thus the entire Industrial civilization conducted a comprehensive critique. The core assertions they put forward are all based on the concern and reflection on reality. Therefore, choosing the notion of “reality” undoubtedly provides a good foundation for building the dialogue between Marx and Berjayv’s philosophy The opportunity. Marxist philosophy is the most concrete critique of the reality of capitalism. As far as the definition of “reality ” is concerned, Marx has completed his transformation from intuition, staticness to practice and dynamism so as to transfer the reality of the world into the sight of being truly human and at the realistic level