论文部分内容阅读
本文以翔实的材料探讨了thefor+n./Pron．+to－infinitive和theofn．／pron．+to－infinitive这两种只有一词之差、使和频率相当高的结构之区别。前者搭配范围宽，在句中可充当表语、定语、状语、复合宾语和主语，而后者只能用于Itis＋adjj之后。虽然前者在充当主语时也可用于Itis+之后，但二者所用的adjj．大都不同，表达的意思不同，转换的句型不同，可否省略也不同，因而把theof+n．／pron+to－infintive也可看作主语的说法是值得商榷的。
This article explores thefor + n. / Pron. + to-infinitive and theofn. / Pron. + to-infinitive The only difference between these two terms is the distinction between structures that are quite frequent. The former with a wide range, in the sentence can be used as a table of words, attribute, adverbial, compound object and subject, which can only be used after Itis + adjj. Although the former can also be used after Itis + when acting as the subject, the adjj used by both. Mostly different, the meaning of different expressions, the conversion of different sentence patterns, whether omitted or different, so theof + n. / Pron + to-infintive can also be regarded as the subject of the argument is questionable.