论文部分内容阅读
一、中华书局点校本《元史》卷一四《世祖十一》至元二十四年(1287)十一月条记载:“弛太原、保德河鱼禁。”此处“太原”“保德”二地并列,并不妥当。据《元史》卷五八《地理一》,时太原为路总管府,而保德为其下辖一州。故而此处应为:“弛太原保德河鱼禁。”二、《元史》卷五○《五行一》中有大德四年(1300)六月“归德睢州大水”的记载。此处“归德睢州”之述有误。据《元史》卷五九《地理二》,睢州属汴梁路管辖,与归德府之间无隶属关系。故此处应断为:“归德、睢州大水。”
First, the Zhonghua Book Company School “Yuan Shi” Volume IV “Shi Zu XI” to Yuan twenty-four years (1287) November record: “Chi Taiyuan, Baode River fish ban.” “Here ” Taiyuan “” Prudential “tied the two places, not appropriate. According to ”Yuan Shi“ volume fifty-eight ”Geography“, when Taiyuan Road Explorer, and Prudential administered a state. Therefore, the place should be: ”Chi Taiyuan Baode River fish ban.“ Second, the ”Yuan Shi“ volume fifty five ”a“ in four years (1300) June The record. Here ”to Germany Dan state “ is wrong. According to ”Yuan Shi“ Volume 59 ”Geography 2“, Danzhou is under the jurisdiction of Liang Liang Road, and go to the German government no affiliation. So here should be broken: ”Return to Germany, Danzhou flood. "