目的探析庆大霉素在伤口换药中的护理对策。方法本次研究资料选自2012年1月-2014年7月期间在我院接受伤口换药且未能达到愈合标准的74例患者,将其平均划分为对照组和试验组。两组研究对象均接受庆大霉素作为其主要治疗药材,与此同时,对照组37例研究对象接受常规护理,而试验组37例研究对象接受针对性护理方案,并对比及分析两组研究对象的效果。结果两组研究对象在有效率之间的比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论临床上庆大霉素在伤口换药中的护理具有较高可行性,建议推广。 Objective To analyze the nursing countermeasures of gentamycin in dressing change. Methods The data of this study were selected from 74 patients who underwent wound dressing in our hospital from January 2012 to July 2014 and failed to meet the standard of healing. The patients were equally divided into control group and experimental group. In both groups, gentamicin was accepted as the main therapeutic drug. In the meantime, 37 subjects in the control group received routine nursing care while 37 subjects in the experimental group received targeted nursing regimens and compared and analyzed two groups of studies The effect of the object. Results There was significant difference between the two groups in the effective rate (P <0.05). Conclusion Clinical gentamicin in the wound dressing in the higher feasibility of the proposed promotion.