论文部分内容阅读
司法机关对“在公共场所当众猥亵”加重处罚情节认定方面的困惑,源于坚守形式法治与追寻实质合理性之间的紧张关系,其根本症结在于从“流氓罪”分解出猥亵犯罪时立法上的不周延。为此,应适度容忍实践理性对制度理性的正当偏离。在立法修改的背景下,有必要采取类型化与概括性相结合的方式,对《刑法修正案(九)》增设的猥亵犯罪“其他恶劣情节”予以合理解释。
The confusion on the part of the judiciary over the determination of the aggravating circumstances of the sanctions imposed by the public molestation stems from the tension between the adherence to the rule of law and the pursuit of substantive rationality. The crux of the matter lies in breaking down obscenities from “hooliganism” Legislation in crime is not continuous. For this reason, the proper deviation of practical rationality from institutional rationality should be moderately tolerated. In the context of legislative amendment, it is necessary to take a combination of typology and generality to explain reasonably the “indecent assault” and “other abuses” added in the Criminal Law Amendment (IX).