郭沫若因有多方面之学术成就,且位据要津,生前享有殊荣。去世后,每闻学界异议时起,余从不以为怪,盖此公已成古人,任凭后人评说可也。但近读远东出版社之《钱穆和中国文化》一书内余英时《<十批判书>与<先秦诸子系年>互校记》一文,却深感骇怪。此文乃余英时老掉牙之文,却一再抛出。早在1954年秋,余英时即在香港《人生》半月刊第八卷第6、7、8三期连载其所作《郭沫若抄袭钱穆著作考——<十批判书>与<先秦诸 Guo Moruo due to many aspects of academic achievement, and according to Jin, lifetime enjoy a prestigious. After his death, every scholar from the opposition, I never thought it strange, cover the public has become the ancients, despite the comments of future generations can be. However, when I read Yu Qian-ying’s book “Qian Mu and Chinese Culture” in and “Inter-school Notes” of “Departments of Pre-Qin Scholars”, I was deeply surprised. This article is the text of the old Yu Ying, but repeatedly thrown. As early as the autumn of 1954, Yu Yingshi published a series of articles entitled "Guo Mo-ruo’s Works on Qian Mu’s Works - Ten Criticisms and Pre-Qin Zhuang