论文部分内容阅读
目的 比较综合性措施和单纯人畜普遍化疗措施成本一效果差异。方法 用不同的效果指标,评价两种措施在取得单位效果指标的成本消耗量。结果 对每减少1例病人,居民感染率每下降1%的效果指标,单纯人畜普遍化疗措施的成本量少于综合性措施,但对每获得1个单位的血防效果综合指数(SCEI),综合性措施的成本消耗却少于单纯人畜普遍化疗。结论 桃源试点作为血吸虫病封闭性疫区,可以采用阻断传播的干预措施,施行综合性防治对策优于单纯人畜普遍化疗措施。
Objective To compare the effects of comprehensive measures with the cost-effectiveness of universal chemotherapy in human and animals alone. The method uses different effect indexes to evaluate the cost consumption of the two measures in obtaining the unit effect index. Results For each reduction of 1 patient, the infection rate of residents fell 1% for each index, the cost of general chemotherapy alone was less than the comprehensive measures, but for each unit obtained a comprehensive anti-inflammatory effect index (SCEI), comprehensive The cost of sexual measures is less than the general chemotherapy of human and animal. Conclusion Taoyuan pilot as a schistosomiasis closed epidemic area, can be used to block the spread of interventions, the implementation of comprehensive prevention and control measures over the general human and animal melamine chemotherapy.