论文部分内容阅读
编辑同志: 贵刊1986年第1期“经验介绍”栏刊登的《对亮镍、装饰铬、硬铬镀液中有害杂质的处理事例》一文有一稿两投情况。而且,文中介绍的事例也没有事实依据。真实情况是:我厂的该批镀液经该文作者所谓“处理”后,一直都没能进行正常生产。当时我厂准备停止电镀车间生产,所以该五个月内生产的大批零件都已发外加工。其后,本厂决定恢复这个车间生产时,亦曾将该批“处理”过的镀液送外单位化验,证实污染并未彻底除掉,镀液已经报废,经重新配液后才恢复生产。该文作者只是照书本提出的处理方法搬用,书本所述的处理方法会是有根据的、正确的。但作者并未在其‘事例’中运用这些方法取得任何成功,
Editor comrades: your magazine in 1986 No. 1 “experience introduction” published in the column “bright nickel, decorative chrome, hard chrome plating solution of harmful impurities,” the article there is a draft two cast situation. Moreover, the examples presented in the article have no factual basis. The truth is: the batch of plating solution of our factory has not been able to carry on the normal production after the so-called “treatment” by the author of this article. At that time, our factory was ready to stop the electroplating workshop, so a large number of parts produced within the five months had been sent to foreign countries for processing. Subsequently, the factory decided to resume the production of this workshop, also had the batch of “treatment” of the plating solution sent to the outside unit tests confirmed that the pollution has not been completely removed, the bath has been scrapped, after re-dosing before resuming production . The author of this article just moves according to the method proposed in the book, and the method of treatment described in the book will be based on the right and correct. But the author did not make any success in using these methods in his ’case’